Why portfolio reviews beat code challenges in tech hiring

By

Tech hiring is at a crossroads. The standard code challenge, once a trusted test of skill, is losing ground as AI tools like ChatGPT quietly rewrite the rules. Suddenly, quick coding tests can be cracked with a few AI prompts, blurring the line between authentic skill and assisted answers.

At Get on Board, we've seen the shift firsthand. Deep portfolio reviews increasingly outshine rigid coding tests when it comes to spotting real tech talent. Let's break down why portfolios offer a richer, more reliable window into a candidate’s abilities.

🤖 Code challenges: losing their edge in the AI era

Code challenges are designed to measure speed and problem-solving under pressure. Candidates are pushed to write clean code within a tight timeframe, simulating on-the-spot problem solving. Great in theory.

But AI-assisted coding changes everything. Tools like ChatGPT, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code or GitHub Copilot can whip out optimized code snippets faster than many developers, casting doubt on whether the output reflects the candidate’s own craft.

  • AI interference: When code is AI-generated or AI-inspired, it’s tough to gauge true individual skill.
  • Missing team dynamics: Code challenges focus on solo work, ignoring essential collaboration and communication skills.
  • Time pressure skews results: Some brilliant programmers need space to think rather than ticking clocks.
These limitations highlight why code challenges alone can’t tell the whole story anymore.

📁 Portfolio reviews reveal the real story behind the code

Portfolios go beyond isolated tests. They show how developers tackle real projects over time, how they solve problems, and how they contribute to teams.
  • Authentic skill evolution: Portfolios reflect ongoing learning and adaptability, not a single moment frozen in time.
  • Collaboration in action: Pull requests, code reviews, and issue discussions reveal communication skills and teamwork.
  • Context matters: Understanding why and how decisions were made paints a fuller picture than a decontextualized code snippet.
At Get on Board, we encourage recruiters to dig into GitHub profiles carefully. Real talent rarely hides in plain sight.
Portfolio reviews do demand more time and expertise. But AI can help here, too. Our Superpower AI tool scans profiles to highlight meaningful contributions, balancing depth with scale. It’s a smarter way to sift through the noise and spot genuine candidates.
True tech hiring success comes from understanding not just what is coded, but the story behind the code.

Moreover, AI-based tools can uncover hidden gems and validate skills beyond resumes. Read more about this in our article on AI-driven talent insights.

🔍 How Latin American recruiters can adapt

Facing these challenges, here’s our take:
  • Make portfolio review your foundation: Look beyond snapshots; investigate real work histories for authentic growth.
  • Use code challenges wisely: Prefer tailored challenges emphasizing system design or architecture, where AI help is less straightforward.
  • Lean on AI tools: Platforms like Superpower AI can quickly analyze portfolios and reduce human bias.
  • Train your team: Help interviewers spot teamwork and problem-solving narratives within portfolios.
  • Encourage storytelling: Ask candidates to explain decisions behind their code for genuine insight.
With these steps, Latin American recruiters can stay ahead in a job market reshaped by AI.
Code challenges still have value. But mixing careful portfolio reviews with smart AI assistance gives recruiters a richer, more nuanced view of candidates.
At Get on Board, we believe that pairing portfolios with AI-powered analysis is how tech hiring in Latin America will evolve. If you haven’t yet, try Superpower AI to see how efficient and effective portfolio screening can be.

Latest on Blog